Shari’o’in Kotu na Kwanan Nan
(Satumba 2009 zuwa lokacin rubuta shafin)
An wallafa: June 2, 2025
| S/N | BAYANIN SHARI'A | SAƁAWA DOKOKI | MATAKIN SEC/KOTU | MATSAYI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
IST/LA/OA/04/2015 HERITAGE CAPITAL MARKETS LTD VS SEC |
Heritage Capital Markets Limited ya dogara da Takardar Ba da Ikon Wakilci da mai aiwatar da wasiyyar Late Prince C. N. Ukachukwu ya bai wa Celina Okoro (Nee Ukachukwu), domin sayar da wasu hannayen jarin gadon. |
Bayan Hukumar ta binciki ƙorafin, ta yanke cewa Takardar Ba da Ikon Wakilci ɗin bai ba wadda aka bai wa ikon ko wakiliyar ta (kamar Heritage Capital Market) damar sayar da ko ɗaya daga hannayen jarin ba. Saboda haka Hukumar ta ba da umarni a mayar da duk hannayen jarin ga gadon. Heritage Capital Market Limited ya shigar da wannan ƙara a Kotun Zuba Jari da Takardun Jari yana ƙalubalantar umarnin Hukumar, bisa dalilin cewa sakamakon binciken Hukumar ya bambanta da na Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), wadda ita ma ta binciki ƙorafin kuma ta ga cewa mai shigar da ƙara ba shi da laifi a ma'amalar. |
mai shigar da ƙara ya janye ƙarar, aka cire ta daga jerin shari'o'i. |
| 2 |
IST/OA/06/2017 C. N. UKACHUKWU & SONS V SEC |
mai shigar da ƙara ya yi ƙorafin cewa Heritage Capital Markets Limited ya dogara da Takardar Ba da Ikon Wakilci da mai aiwatar da wasiyyar Late Prince C. N. Ukachukwu ya bai wa Celina Okoro (Nee Ukachukwu), wadda ake ƙara ta 3, domin sayar da wasu hannayen jarin gadon. |
A ƙarshen binciken, Hukumar ta ba da umarni cewa, tun da batun ya shafi aiwatar da wasiyya kuma Heritage Capital Markets Limited ta riga ta mayar da sama da 80% na abin da ake nema, masu gabatar da ƙorafi su nemi wasu hanyoyin warware sauran batutuwan da ke tsakaninsu da wadda ake ƙara ta 3, wadda 'yar iyalin ce. masu shigar da ƙara sun shigar da wannan ƙara suna ƙalubalantar matakin da Hukumar ta ɗauka. A ranar 14 ga Mayu, 2019, Kotun ta yanke hukunci, ta amince da wasiƙar Hukumar ta 4 ga Mayu, 2015, wadda ta umarci waɗanda ake ƙara na 2 da na 3 su sake sayen duk hannayen jarin masu shigar da ƙara da aka sayar ba bisa ƙa'ida ba. Saboda haka an umarci waɗanda ake ƙarar su sake sayen duk sauran hannayen jarin masu shigar da ƙara. An yi watsi da ƙarar martani da wanda ake ƙara na 2 ya shigar, kuma an umarci Hukumar ta tabbatar da bin hukuncin Kotun. |
An kammala batun. |
| 3 |
IST/OA/03/2015 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION VS MEGA ASSET MANAGERS LIMITED & 5 ORS |
Hukumar ta karɓi ƙorafe-ƙorafe da dama daga masu zuba jari kan Mega Asset Managers Limited da daraktocinta, suna zargin cewa kamfanin bai cika wajibcinsa ga masu zuba jari ba. |
Binciken Hukumar ya nuna cewa kamfanin na cikin matsalar kuɗi kuma ba ya iya biyan masu zuba jari. An gurfanar da kamfanin da daraktocinsa a gaban Kwamitin Sauraron Shari’o’in Gudanarwa na Hukumar domin sauraron shari'ar a hukumance. Duk da haka, Hukumar ta shigar da wannan Buƙatar Fara Shari’a a Kotun domin neman umarnin daskarar da duk kadarorin kamfanin da za a iya ganowa har sai an san sakamakon sauraron APC. |
An amince da umarnin da Hukumar ta nema, kuma an kammala batun. |
| 4 |
IST/APP/01/2014 – ADEFARATI FRANCIS VS SEC IST/APP/02/2014 – MR. OLAYINKA ABIMBOLA VS SEC IST/APP/03/2014 – MR ADEGBAJU SOLOMON VS SEC IST/APP/04/2014 – RESORT SAVING & LOANS PLC VS SEC |
Waɗannan ɗaukaka ƙara sun samo asali ne daga hukuncin APC na Hukumar a shari'ar SEC vs. VICAD Securities Ltd & 16 others. masu ɗaukaka ƙara daraktoci ne na Resort Saving & Loans Plc (mai ɗaukaka ƙara na 4), kamfanin da ya gudanar da tayin ga zaɓaɓɓu a 2008 inda aka miƙa takardun jari da ba a yi wa rajista ba ga jama'a ba tare da amincewar Hukumar tun farko ba, saɓanin Sashe na 75 na ISA 2007. |
Bayan Hukumar ta binciki batun, an tura shi APC domin sauraro. APC ta sami masu ɗaukaka ƙara da laifi, kuma aka hukunta su yadda ya dace. masu ɗaukaka ƙara sun shigar da waɗannan ɗaukaka ƙara daban-daban, suna roƙon Kotun ta soke hukuncin APC tare da ɗage haramcin, dakatarwa ko sauran takunkuman da Hukumar ta ɗora musu. | An yanke hukunci a ranar 5 ga Disamba, 2018, inda aka tabbatar da hukuncin APC na Hukumar, amma Kotun ta rage takunkuman da aka ɗora wa masu ɗaukaka ƙara. An kammala batun. |
| 5 |
IST/OA/03/18 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V ALL TRUST HERITAGE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED |
All Trust International Limited ya yi ayyukan kasuwar jari ba tare da rajista ba, saɓanin doka. Hukumar ta karɓi ƙorafe-ƙorafe da dama, ciki har da wasiƙar ƙorafi mai kwanan wata 28 ga Agusta, 2016 daga tsohon ma'aikacin kamfanin, wadda ta ce an karɓi fiye da N250 miliyan daga mutane daban-daban a Bonny Island. | Bayan binciken farko, Hukumar ta shigar da Buƙatar Fara Shari’a a Kotun tana neman umarnin daskarar da asusun kamfanin bisa Sashe na 13 (x) na Investments and Securities Act, 2007, saboda gudanar da ayyukan kasuwar jari ba bisa ƙa'ida ba, saɓanin Sashe na 6 na ISA, 2007. | An amince da umarnin da Hukumar ta nema, kuma an kammala batun. |
| 6 |
IST/APP/01/18 TAIWO OJETUNDE V SEC & 2 ORS |
Mr. Taiwo Ojetunde (mai ɗaukaka ƙara) yana ɗaya daga daraktocin Partnership Investment Company Plc. Hukumar ta karɓi ƙorafe-ƙorafe da dama kan kamfanin kuma ta bincike su yadda ya dace. Hukumar ta gano cewa kamfanin ya ba da kayayyakin da ba a yi musu rajista a Hukumar ba. |
Hukumar ta kai kamfanin da duk daraktocinsa gaban APC a shari'ar APC/01/2017 Head of Enforcement Department (SEC) vs Partnership Investment Company Plc & 17 Ors domin sauraro, kuma mai ɗaukaka ƙara shi ne mai amsa ƙara na 6. APC na Hukumar ta sami masu amsa ƙara da laifi. mai ɗaukaka ƙara ya ɗaukaka ƙara a IST kan hukuncin APC, yana neman a soke shi bisa hujjar cewa APC ba ta da hurumin sauraron batun kuma an tauye masa haƙƙin sauraro na adalci a tsarin. |
An yanke hukunci kan mai ɗaukaka ƙara, inda Kotun ta tabbatar da hukuncin Hukumar. Sai dai ya sake ɗaukaka ƙara zuwa Kotun Ɗaukaka Ƙara, amma Kotun Ɗaukaka Ƙara ba ta bayar da ranar sauraro ba. |
| 7 |
IST/LA/OA/06/18 WEMA BANK PLC V SEC & ANOR |
Hukumar ta karɓi ƙorafi daga Ose Ogunkorode kan WEMA Bank Plc, yana zargin cewa bankin bai mayar masa da N59,172,000 ba, wato darajar hannayen jarin bankin guda 12,780,130 da ba a ware masa ba. | Hukumar ta binciki ƙorafin kuma ta gano cewa mai ƙorafin ya nemi hannayen jarin bankin guda 20,552,193, inda ya biya N95,156,657. Sai dai an ware masa guda 7,219,870, wanda ya bar guda 12,780,130 masu darajar N59,172,000. Mai ƙorafin ya ce ba a ware masa sauran hannayen jarin ba, kuma ba a mayar masa da kuɗinsa ba. A nata ɓangaren, WEMA Bank ta ce WEMA Asset Management Limited ta ajiye hannayen jari guda 12,780,130 saboda ba ta karɓi darajarsu daga Greenwich Trust Limited, wadda aka bi ta wajen ma'amalar ba. Duk da haka, Hukumar ta umarci WEMA Bank ta mayar wa mai saka jari kuɗin, kuma aka ɗora wa bankin tarar N5000 a kowace rana kan saɓawar. Bankin ya shigar da ƙarar nan a Kotun yana neman a soke hukuncin Hukumar kan batun. |
A hukuncinta, Kotun ta tabbatar da binciken Hukumar cewa Wema Bank ta mayar wa mai hannun jari kuɗin sayar da hannayen jarin tare da diyyar N200,000.00. WEMA Bank ta ɗaukaka ƙara kan hukuncin Kotun, amma Kotun Ɗaukaka Ƙara ba ta bayar da ranar sauraro ba. |
| 8 |
CA/A/998/2018 SEC & 4 ORS VS TSOMENEFA HENRI KOUNOUGNA |
Sa idon da Hukumar ta yi kan ayyukan Flexus Global Services Limited ya nuna cewa kamfanin yana neman kuɗi daga jama'a domin zuba jari ba tare da an yi masa rajista a Hukumar tun farko ba. Saboda haka ayyukan kamfanin ba su dace da doka ba. |
Hukumar tare da Sashen ’Yan Sanda sun rufe ayyukan kamfanin da ba su dace da doka ba, suka kuma kama wasu mutane, ciki har da Mr. Tsomenefa Henri Kounougna (mai shigar da ƙara), wanda shi ma babban jami'i ne a kamfanin. mai shigar da ƙara ya shigar da ƙarar nan a Babbar Kotun Tarayya yana zargin an tauye masa haƙƙinsa na asali a yayin wannan mataki. Babbar Kotun Tarayya ta yanke hukunci a amfaninsa, amma Hukumar ta ɗaukaka ƙara kan hukuncin Babbar Kotun Tarayya, wanda ya ce Hukumar ta tauye haƙƙin mai shigar da ƙara na asali kuma ya ba shi N5 miliyan a matsayin diyya daga Hukumar. Hukumar ta shigar da ɗaukaka ƙara a Kotun Ɗaukaka Ƙara domin neman a soke hukuncin. |
Ɗaukaka ƙarar Hukumar kan hukuncin Babbar Kotun Tarayya tana jiran sauraro, amma ba a bayar da ranar sauraro ba. |
| 9 |
IST/OA/08/2018 FIDELITY COMPANY LIMITED & 2 ORS V FORTE OIL PLC & 2 ORS |
Fidelity Finance Company Limited, Mr. Osa Osunde da Mr. Nosa Osunde (masu shigar da ƙara a wannan shari'a) sun shiga wasu ma'amaloli marasa tsari dangane da tayin hannun jari ga jama’a na AP Plc (wanda yanzu ake kira Forte Oil Plc) a 2008, saɓanin Investments and Securities Act, 2007. |
Hukumar ta binciki batun kuma ta sami daraktocin da laifi. Hukumar ta kuma umarce su su sayar da duk hannayen jarin da suke da su a AP Plc ga masu hannun jari na da, su kuma daina zama a kwamitin gudanarwa na kamfanin. An kuma umurci mai shigar da ƙara na 1 ya mayar wa AP Plc ribar hannun jari da ya karɓa tare da ribar da ta taru a kan hannayen jarin da aka ware masa bisa tayin 2008. Waɗannan umarnin suna cikin wasiƙar Hukumar mai kwanan wata 7 ga Disamba, 2010. A 2016, Hukumar ta sake duba matakin bin umarninsu, ta kuma aika wasiƙa mai kwanan wata 25 ga Afrilu, 2016 tana tabbatar da cewa sun bi duk umarnin Hukumar kuma an janye duk shari'o'in da ake yi da su kan wannan batu. Daga baya, masu shigar da ƙara sun aika takardar ƙorafi zuwa Hukumar mai kwanan wata 28 ga Mayu, 2018, suna neman Hukumar ta sa Forte Oil Plc ta ba su ribar hannun jari da ya taru tsawon shekaru kan wasu hannayen jarin Forte Oil Plc guda 27,114,506. Sun bayyana cewa an yi amfani da waɗannan hannayen jarin a matsayin jingina domin samun rance daga tsohuwar Afribank Plc, kuma kwanan nan an mayar musu da su bayan umarnin Babbar Kotun Tarayya kan batun. Da Hukumar ta karɓi wannan wasiƙa, ta sake duba shari'ar ta kuma yanke cewa hannayen jarin Forte Oil Plc guda 27,114,506, waɗanda suke cikin hannayen jarin da masu shigar da ƙara suka mallaka a AP Plc a 2010, suna daga cikin waɗanda ya kamata su sayar bisa umarnin da aka ba su. An sanar da masu shigar da ƙara hakan ta wasiƙa mai kwanan wata 2 ga Agusta, 2018. masu shigar da ƙara sun shigar da wannan ƙara suna neman a soke umarnin Hukumar a wasiƙar 2 ga Agusta, 2018, kuma a tabbatar da cewa wasiƙar farko ta 25 ga Afrilu, 2016 ita ce ke nuna ainihin halin da ake ciki. |
Kotun ta yanke hukunci a amfanin mai shigar da ƙara, amma Forte Oil da Mai Kula da Rajista sun ɗaukaka ƙara kan hukuncin. Hukumar ba ta shiga ɗaukaka ƙarar ba. |
| 10 |
FHC/L/CS/1778/2018 MR ANTHONY EZE & ANOR vs. IGP & 6 ORS |
Mr. Anthony Eze da Mr. Emmanuel Ugbo (masu shigar da buƙata) daraktoci ne na DVCF Oil & Gas Plc, kamfanin asusun jarin tallafa wa sabbin kamfanoni masu yiwuwar bunƙasa da ke mai da hankali kan zuba jari a ɓangaren man fetur da gas. Asusun da kamfanin ke kula da shi ya ragu ƙwarai ta hanyar da ta jawo tambayoyi, hakan ya sa Hukumar ta fara bincike. |
Binciken musamman da Hukumar ta yi kan asusun ya bayyana saɓawa dokoki da dama daga kamfanin. An kai kamfanin da daraktocinsa gaban APC na Hukumar domin sauraro. An sami daraktocin da laifi, kuma aka hukunta su yadda ya dace. Sun ƙalubalanci hukuncin APC na Hukumar a Kotun, amma Kotun ta tabbatar da hukuncin Hukumar. Daraktoci biyu sun shigar da ƙarar kare haƙƙinsu na asali a Babbar Kotun Tarayya Lagos, suna zargin cewa hukuncin Kotun kan batun ya wanke su daga duk wani alhakin aikata laifi game da gudanar da DVCF Oil & Gas Fund. Saboda haka suna neman matakan kotu da dama, ciki har da sanarwar cewa tsangwamar da Sashen ’Yan Sandan SEC ta yi wa masu shigar da buƙata ta tauye haƙƙinsu na asali, bisa dalilin cewa Kotun ta riga ta yanke hukunci kan ɗaukaka ƙarar da aka shigar a batun. |
mai shigar da buƙata ya janye batun, kotu kuma ta cire shi daga jerin shari'o'i. |
| 11 |
CA/L/88/2011 BIG TREAT & 3 ORS vs SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION & 2 0RS |
Daraktocin Big Treat Plc, kamfanin jama'a da aka jera a kasuwa, ba su gudanar da kamfanin yadda ya dace ba, saɓanin SEC Ƙa’idar Shugabancin Kamfani. |
A 2008, Hukumar ta gudanar da bincike kan harkokin Big Treat Plc ta gano saɓawa Investments and Securities Act, 2007 da dama, kamar rashin isassun tsare-tsaren kula da harkokin cikin gida da rugujewar shugabancin kamfani. Bisa waɗannan binciken, a 2010 Hukumar ta je Babbar Kotun Tarayya tana neman matakan kotu da dama kan Big Treat Plc, daraktocinsa uku da kamfanoni biyu da yake da su, domin kare kadarorin kamfanin. Kamfanin da daraktocinsa sun yi adawa da umarnin wucin gadi da Kotun ta bayar, suna cewa kamfanin ba mai gudanar da harkokin kasuwar jari ne da ke ƙarƙashin ikon sa ido na Hukumar ba. An soke umarnin, amma Hukumar ta yi nasarar ƙalubalantar hukuncin Babbar Kotun Tarayya; a hukuncinta mai kwanan wata 31 ga Janairu 2019, Kotun Ɗaukaka Ƙara ta ce Big Treat Plc, a matsayin kamfanin jama'a da aka jera a kasuwa wanda ya miƙa takardun jari ga masu zuba jari, mai gudanar da harkokin kasuwar jari ne, kuma Hukumar na iya shiga harkokinsa bisa Investments and Securities Act, 2007. Kamfanin da daraktocinsa sun sake ɗaukaka ƙara zuwa Kotun Ƙoli kan hukuncin Kotun Ɗaukaka Ƙara. |
Ɗaukaka ƙarar Big Treat a Kotun Ƙoli tana nan a jira a halin yanzu, amma kotun ƙoli ba ta bayar da ranar sauraro ba. |
| 12 |
FHC/L/CS/910/2019 MR. JUBRIL ADEWALE TINUBU & ANOR VS SEC & ANOR |
A Yuli, 2017, Hukumar ta karɓi koke biyu daga Alhaji Dahiru Mangal da Ansbury Incorporated suna zargin gazawa iri-iri a shugabancin kamfani da saɓawa ƙa'idoji a Oando Plc. Daga cikin abubuwan da aka nuna akwai ciniki bisa bayanan sirri na cikin gida, ma'amala da ɓangarorin da ke da alaƙa wadda ba a bayyana ba, da albashin daraktoci fiye da tanadin Kundin Ayyukan Kwamitin Daraktoci, da sauransu. Binciken Hukumar ya kai ga Binciken Asusun Kuɗi domin Gano Shaida da Deloitte and Touche suka gudanar, wanda rahotonsa ya tabbatar da zarge-zargen gazawar shugabancin kamfanin tare da wasu kura-kurai. Bisa sakamakon masu binciken, Hukumar ta aika wasiƙa ga kamfanin da daraktocin da abin ya shafa tana ba da umarni kamar haka: 1. Daraktocin Kwamitin Daraktoci na Oando Plc da abin ya shafa su yi murabus, 2. A kira babban taron masu hannun jari na musamman a ko kafin 1 ga Yuli, 2019, domin naɗa sabbin daraktoci, 3. Kamfanin da mutane da daraktocin da abin ya shafa su biya tarar kuɗi, 4. Daraktocin Kwamitin Daraktoci da abin ya shafa su mayar wa kamfanin albashin da aka biya su ba bisa ƙa'ida ba, 5. A hana Babban Jami’in Gudanarwar Rukuni (GCEO) da Mataimakin Babban Jami’in Gudanarwar Rukuni (DGCEO) na Oando Plc zama daraktocin kamfanonin jama'a na tsawon shekaru biyar (5). |
Wannan shari'ar haƙƙin ɗan Adam na asali ce da Mr. Jubril Adewale Tinubu, Babban Jami’in Gudanarwar Rukuni (GCEO), da Mr. Omamofe Boyo, Mataimakin Babban Jami’in Gudanarwar Rukuni (DGCEO) na OANDO Plc suka shigar, suna neman a hana Hukumar aiwatar da takunkuman da aka ɗora musu. Bisa Rahoton Binciken Asusun Kuɗi domin Gano Shaida, Hukumar ta ɗora wa GCEO tarar N91,125,000.00 a wasiƙarta mai kwanan wata 31 ga Mayu, 2019, kuma ta hana masu shigar da buƙata biyu zama daraktocin kamfanonin jama'a na tsawon shekaru 5. An bayar da umarnin hana aiwatarwa na wucin gadi, wanda ya hana Hukumar ci gaba da aiwatar da hukuncin da ake ƙalubalanta a wannan shari'ar. | An gabatar da batun a ranar 22 ga Yuni, 2020, kotu ta umarci ɓangarorin su zaɓi wata ranar sauraro saboda shekarar shari'a tana gab da ƙarewa. Saboda haka an dage sauraron zuwa 30 ga Satumba, 2020. |
| 13 |
FHC/L/CS/911/2019 MR. ADEWALE TINUBU & ANOR VS SEC & ANOR |
Kamar yadda aka bayyana a sama | Wannan roƙon Nazarin Kotu kan Halaccin Hukunci ne da GCEO da DGCEO na Oando Plc suka shigar, suna neman umarnin kotu na soke hukunci (certiorari) domin soke hukuncin Hukumar a wasiƙarta mai kwanan wata 31 ga Mayu, 2019, wanda ya ɗora wa mai shigar da buƙata na 1 tarar N91,125,000.00 kuma ya hana masu shigar da buƙata biyu zama daraktocin kamfanonin jama'a na tsawon shekaru 5. Suna kuma roƙon kotu ta soke hukuncin Hukumar na naɗa ƙungiyar gudanarwa ta wucin gadi ga Oando Plc, kamar yadda aka bayyana a sanarwar manema labarai da Hukumar ta fitar a ranar 2 ga Yuni, 2019. | An gabatar da batun a ranar 22 ga Yuni, 2020, kotu ta umarci ɓangarorin su zaɓi wata ranar sauraro saboda shekarar shari'a tana gab da ƙarewa. Saboda haka an dage sauraron zuwa 21 ga Oktoba, 2020. |
| 14 |
FHC/L/CS/964/2019 MR. MOBOLAJI OSUNSANYA VS SEC & 2 ORS |
Kamar yadda aka bayyana a sama | Wannan shari'ar haƙƙin ɗan Adam na asali ce da ɗaya daga daraktocin Oando Plc, Mr. Mobolaji Osunsanya, ya shigar yana ƙalubalantar hukuncin Hukumar a wasiƙarta mai kwanan wata 31 ga Mayu, 2019, wadda ta umarci mai shigar da buƙata ya yi murabus daga kwamitin daraktoci na Oando Plc. Babban dalilin neman taimakon kotu shi ne ba a ba shi damar kare kansa kan sakamakon binciken da Hukumar ta dogara da shi ba. | An gabatar da batun a ranar 22 ga Yuni, 2020 domin sauraro, sannan aka cire shi daga jerin shari'o'i bayan mai shigar da buƙata ya nemi janye ƙarar. |
| 15 |
FHC/L/CS/965/2019 OANDO PLC VS SEC & 2 ORS |
Kamar yadda aka bayyana a sama | Wannan shari'ar haƙƙin ɗan Adam na asali ce da OANDO Plc ta shigar domin soke umarnin Hukumar a wasiƙarta mai kwanan wata 31 ga Mayu, 2019, wanda ya ɗora mata jimillar tarar N86,625,000.00 kuma ya umarci a cire GCEO da DGCEO nata daga matsayin daraktoci, tare da murabus na sauran mambobin kwamitin daraktoci na kamfanin. An kuma nemi waɗannan matakan kotu bisa dalilin cewa ba a ba kamfanin damar kare kansa kan sakamakon binciken da Hukumar ta dogara da shi ba. | An gabatar da batun a ranar 22 ga Yuni, 2020, kotu ta umarci ɓangarorin su zaɓi wata ranar sauraro saboda shekarar shari'a tana gab da ƙarewa. Saboda haka an dage sauraron zuwa 30 ga Satumba, 2020. |
| 16 |
FHC/L/CS/966/2019 MR. OLUFEMI ADEYEMO VS SEC & 2 ORS |
Kamar yadda aka bayyana a sama | Wannan shari'ar haƙƙin ɗan Adam na asali ce da Mr. Olufemi Adeyemo, ɗaya daga daraktocin OANDO Plc, ya shigar yana neman umarnin kotu na soke umarnin Hukumar a wasiƙa mai kwanan wata 31 ga Mayu, 2019, wadda ta ɗora wa mai shigar da buƙata tarar N91,125,000.00 kuma ta umurce shi ya yi murabus daga kwamitin daraktoci na kamfanin. Dalilin neman waɗannan matakan kotu shi ne ba a ba shi damar kare kansa kan sakamakon binciken da Hukumar ta dogara da shi ba. | An gabatar da batun a ranar 22 ga Yuni, 2020, kotu ta umarci ɓangarorin su zaɓi wata ranar sauraro saboda shekarar shari'a tana gab da ƙarewa. Saboda haka an dage sauraron zuwa 30 ga Satumba, 2020. |
| 17 |
FHC/L/CS/1031/2019 OANDO PLC vs MS MARY UDUK & 2 ORS |
Kamar yadda aka bayyana a sama | Wannan roƙon Nazarin Kotu kan Halaccin Hukunci ne da Oando Plc ta shigar, tana neman umarnin kotu na soke hukunci (certiorari) domin soke hukuncin Hukumar a wasiƙarta mai kwanan wata 31 ga Mayu, 2019, wanda ya ɗora mata jimillar tarar N86,625,000.00 kuma ya ba da umarnin a kira babban taron masu hannun jari na musamman na kamfanin a ko kafin 1 ga Yuli, 2019 domin naɗa sabbin daraktoci. mai shigar da buƙata kuma na roƙon kotu ta soke hukuncin Hukumar na naɗa ƙungiyar gudanarwa ta wucin gadi ga kamfanin, kamar yadda aka bayyana a sanarwar manema labarai da Hukumar ta fitar a ranar 2 ga Yuni, 2019. An bayar da umarnin hana aiwatarwa na wucin gadi, wanda ya hana Hukumar ci gaba da aiwatar da hukuncin da ake ƙalubalanta a wannan shari'ar. | An gabatar da batun a ranar 22 ga Yuni, 2020, kotu ta umarci ɓangarorin su zaɓi wata ranar sauraro saboda shekarar shari'a tana gab da ƙarewa. Saboda haka an dage sauraron zuwa 21 ga Oktoba, 2020. |
| 18 |
CA/L/53/2017 FHC/L/CS/767/15-BGL PLC &ORS VSEC |
Hukumar ta karɓi ƙorafe-ƙorafe fiye da 40 daga masu zuba jari kan BGL Group, rassansa da mutanen da ƙungiya ta gabatar domin rajista, suna zargin karya amana da zamba na kusan N5.8 biliyan. Hukumar ta fara binciken harkokin BGL Group kuma daga ƙarshe ta samu umarnin kotu da ya ba ta damar kafa Ƙungiyar Gudanarwa ta Wucin Gadi (IMT) ga BGL Group. Binciken farko na IMT ya nuna cewa BGL Group na cikin matsananciyar matsalar kuɗi wadda ke haifar da babban haɗari ga masu zuba jari na yanzu da na gaba, da ma kasuwar jari gaba ɗaya. Wasu daga cikin saɓawar da binciken ya nuna sun haɗa da zuba jari masu cike da shakku a takardun jari da ba a jera a kasuwa ba da kuma waɗanda ba su da sauƙin sayarwa, saɓanin Dokoki da Ƙa’idoji na Hukumar. Hukumar ta kuma ɗauki ƙarin matakan gudanarwa, ciki har da dakatar da BGL Group daga duk ayyukan kasuwar jari. An kuma gayyaci kamfanin da manyan jami'ansa su bayyana a gaban Kwamitin Sauraron Shari’o’in Gudanarwa (APC) na Hukumar. |
masu shigar da ƙara sun shigar da wannan ƙara suna ƙalubalantar dakatarwar da Hukumar ta yi musu daga kasuwar jari. A ranar 31 ga Oktoba, 2016, Babbar Kotun Tarayya ta yanke hukuncin cire ƙarar daga jerin shari'o'i saboda ba ta cika sharuɗɗan doka ba. masu ɗaukaka ƙara sun ɗaukaka ƙara domin ƙalubalantar hukuncin Babbar Kotun Tarayya kan batun. |
An yi musayar takardun hujja, amma ba a bayar da ranar sauraro ba tukuna. |
| 19 |
CA/L/55/17 FHC/L/CS/1050/15-BGL &ORS VS SEC &ORS |
Kamar yadda aka bayyana a sama |
masu shigar da ƙara sun shigar da wannan ƙara suna ƙalubalantar gayyatar da aka yi musu su bayyana a gaban Kwamitin Sauraron Shari’o’in Gudanarwa (APC) na Hukumar. A ranar 31 ga Oktoba, 2016, Babbar Kotun Tarayya ta yanke hukuncin cire ƙarar daga jerin shari'o'i saboda ba ta cika sharuɗɗan doka ba. masu ɗaukaka ƙara sun shigar da wannan ɗaukaka ƙara suna ƙalubalantar hukuncin Babbar Kotun Tarayya kan batun. |
An yi musayar takardun hujja, amma ba a bayar da ranar sauraro ba tukuna. |
| 20 |
CA/L/56/2017 FHC/L/CS/121/16-BGL Asset Management Ltd & ORS VS SEC & ORS |
Bayan Hukumar ta karɓi sabbin ƙorafe-ƙorafe goma (10) daga masu zuba jari tsakanin 20 ga Mayu, 2015 da 10 ga Nuwamba, 2015, masu jimillar darajar kadarori fiye da N2.9 biliyan, kan BGL Assets Management Ltd da mutanen da ƙungiya ta gabatar domin rajista nata, Hukumar ta sake gayyatar masu shigar da ƙara su bayyana a gaban APC. |
masu shigar da ƙara sun ƙi amsa gayyatar ta hanyar shigar da wannan ƙara suna neman umarnin hana Hukumar gudanar da APC da aka shirya. An cire batun daga jerin shari'o'i a ranar 31/10/16, lokacin da kotu ta ce kuskuren da ke cikin roƙon Nazarin Kotu kan Halaccin Hukunci ya hana ta samun hurumin sauraron ƙarar. BGL Group ba ta gamsu ba, ta ɗaukaka ƙara a Kotun Ɗaukaka Ƙara tana ƙalubalantar hukuncin Babbar Kotun Tarayya kan batutuwan da aka ambata. |
An yi musayar takardun hujja, amma ba a bayar da ranar sauraro ba tukuna. |